McTaggart takes on Cayman slight in UK commons

| 18/02/2011

(CNS): Despite the departure of Anthony Travers, Cayman Finance is keeping up with the work he started. Interim Chairman Roy McTaggart has sent a letter to Ronnie Campbell, MP (left), a UK parliamentarian who referred to the Cayman Islands as a tax haven during a debate in the House of Commons on Wednesday. In the letter he says that Campbell is doing a disservice to his constituents, given the enormous economic benefits UK companies gain by using Cayman when he inaccurately describes the islands as a tax haven. Delivering the same message as his predecessor, McTaggart says Cayman is a fully transparent jurisdiction and not a place where individuals or corporations are able to “hide money”.

During his comments in the UK parliament Campbell, the Labour MP for Blyth Valley, said he was sick of hearing the argument that there was no money in the UK government’s coffers. “Does my right hon. Friend not agree that, if all the multinational companies, including the banks, paid the tax on their profits instead of avoiding doing so by hiding their money in tax havens such as the Cayman islands, we would not have this problem? We would have bags of money-billions of pounds,” he said.

In his letter McTaggart, who took up the role only this week, said the statement was factually inaccurate and that UK-based multinational companies and corporate structures that are domiciled in the Cayman Islands have done so legally and in compliance with their domestic tax laws.

“This model allows these companies to make the most efficient use of capital held in the UK, thereby creating employment and wealth for your constituents,” McTaggart wrote. “The tax neutral platform which the Cayman Islands provide to international financing transactions has nothing whatsoever to do with the issue of tax evasion. Cayman Island entities pay taxes in the jurisdictions where the profits are made in accordance with the laws of those jurisdictions.”

He pointed out that the responsibility for the ability of UK companies to use Cayman remained with UK tax laws.

See McTaggart’s letter below.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Category: Business

About the Author ()

Comments (3)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    Cayman is the “cat to kick” when other countries have tough economic times.

    The most recent was of course the mortgage back meltdown which was perpetrated by their own commissioned based greed and politically favorable economic indicators such as new housing starts. Why not give a mortgage and receive the commission if only minimal risk is actually assumed and conflicted rating agencies and promoters can spin the commissioned sale? Was it coincidence that it was exposed just prior to the term of a new president. Better to inherit a burst bubble than have it burst in the early days your administration.

    It is admirable that we have had the benefit of such knowledgeable members of our financial industry respond to such self serviing and ingnorant rhetoric.
    Keep up the good work and hope your interim leadership is a long one Roy.

  2. Anonymous says:

    “given the enormous economic benefits UK companies gain by using Cayman ”

    this is the problem — the benefit is tax reduction which forces the rest of the populace to make up the difference.

    It is a perceived notion that rich people and companies are offered special treatment that the rest of us are not able to access. Look around the middle east today and you’ll see uprisings due to similar perceptions of inequalities.

    So I have a serious question, how can individuals access the system to receive the same economic benefits that the companies receive?

  3. Dagny says:

    The soapbox can be a tipsy little pedestal.  Mr. Campbell ought to be very careful of the precarious situation of his own.  If elected government officials spent more time learning about the nature and the implications of their statements, rather than billing the tax payer for personal luxuries, he wouldn’t be called out like this.

    Google Ronnie and find this article –

    He makes a mockery of Government and only reasserts the need to have less Government (and therefore lower taxes needed to pay for it) rather than more.