Foot concedes Cayman’s role

| 21/04/2009

(CNS): On the eve of the British government’s budget which will be presented by the Chancellor Alistair Darling tomorrow, the leader of the team reviewing the UK’s offshore financial centre territories Michael Foot has issued a progress report in which he acknowledges the contribution of the Cayman Islands and other British OFCs to the UK economy as well as the importance of the industry to Cayman’s own domestic product and employment levels.

The UK’s independent review of offshore financial centres was instigated in the wake of Darlings pre-budget report last year when questions were being asked about how much of a part offshore centres had played in the economic crisis despite the fact that the economic credit crunch was a result of the behaviour of onshore lending practices. Foot and his team visited Cayman last moth to assess the jurisdiction with regards to its terms of reference which included assessing the long-term opportunities and challenges facing the British Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories as financial centres.

Foot does not refer specifically to Cayman in the progress report save to list the jurisdiction’s dependence on the sector. The report talks in general terms about all of the offshore financial centres, (OFC) but notes the significant differences in the size of the jurisdictions, the nature of the business being conducted, the reason why the centres have developed in certain ways and the standards of regulation.

On receipt of the progress report the Leader of Government Business Kurt Tibbetts said today, that the government welcomed it and would continue to work with Foot as he moved towards the completion of the full report.

 “The Cayman Islands welcomes this progress report and its observations relating to the importance of the Cayman Islands financial services industry, our commitment to upholding international standards and the interdependent relationship between the financial services  sectors of the Cayman Islands and the UK,” he added. “We look forward to working with Mr Foot and his team to support the completion of this review, expected before the end of 2009.”

The report summarises the economic contributions of the Cayman Islands financial services industry, attributing 36 per cent of the country’s gross domestic product and 21 per cent of total employment to the sector. It also recognised the favourable reviews that the Cayman Islands have received from the International Monetary Fund and the [Caribbean] Financial Action Task Force.

During his visit to Cayman Foot and his team met with a cross-section of public and private sector representatives from the financial services sector. The Cayman Islands government said it assisted the review team prior to the visit and will continue to provide assistance for the duration of the review.

In this progress report Foot continues to ask for input from interested parties regarding issues such as the projected short to medium term outlook for the financial centres and the implications of downsizing. He also asked for comment on whether more should be done to strengthen regulatory co-operation between the UK FSA and the OFC”s local regulators.

The review is also focusing on the risks that the OFCs face flowing from the current and forecast macro-economicenvironment and revealed that Bermuda has increased its debt ceiling beyond its immediate needs to give the option of a strategic response to any problems in the financial sector that pose a systemic threat or risks to its economy. Gibraltar has a compensation schemes for depositors and investors consistent with the requirements of European Directives and the Isle of Man has had a bank deposit protection scheme in place for some. It also stated Guernsey has recently moved to introduce one. “The other financial centres covered by this Review do not currently have ‘safety nets’ in place, but some are actively considering whether to introduce them,” the report stated. Cayman does not have any kind of policy requiring insurance coverage for the deposits held in its retail banking system.

With the renewed focus on tax transparency and tax avoidance the progress report notes this will have implications for the financial centres covered by the Review.

“…the growing focus on tax avoidance and the emergence of national initiatives such as the US Stop Tax Haven Abuse Bill will continue to shape international opinion in the short to medium term. Each centre will need to take this into account in balancing the real or perceived competitive advantages of current tax regimes with the need to generate sufficient revenue to support its domestic economy,” Foots report states.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Category: Business

About the Author ()

Comments (12)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    Sadly we measure prosperity and progress according to how much $50 and $100 notes are given out.



  2. A Concerned Caymanian says:

    Hopefully PPM will be back in power come election but I think they should rotate leadership.  Arden would make a good leader.

  3. Anonymous says:

    In response to first posting….where have you been living? Under Kurt Tibbetts leadership we have progressed and prospered….but perhaps you just can’t comprehend what it means for a Country to progress and prosper….Kurt Tibbets is an honest man, a man that we all can trust, a very capable leader indeed. Wonder if the same could be said about yourself?

    • Anonymous says:

      I hope and pray Mr. Kurt gets back in. If I could vote in GT he would definitely receive my vote. 

  4. Anonymous says:

    Another bitter UDP troll below.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Cayman & Hampstead

    Under Kurt Tibbetts the Cayman Islands will soon go the route of Hampstead.


    • Anonymous says:

      Don’t touch this subject unless you do know about it.  The Hon. D. Kurt Tibbetts is a honest man and i will vote for him at 7am May 20.  It is amazing that people are going around with fine teeth comb to find back door deals and wrong doing on the PPMs  to try and pull them down to their level.   PPM is an open book and you can dig, every thing was done buy the rules.  THIS IS WHY PEOPLE LOVES THE PPM HONESTY.  

      • Anonymous says:

        CUC & PPM

        Why would PPM make the people give CUC millions of dollars after hurricane Ivan for absolutely nothing in return?

        Thats a Government you can Trust to take your hard earned money and give it to a company that has made a profit every year of its operation in Cayman.

        • Anonymous says:

          Kurt Tibbetts

          Some people assume to know Kurt, but can’t even spell his name.

          Anyway, all Mr. Tibbetts has to do is explain to the people what happened with Hampstead. Why has he refused to do so.

          Don’t tell me you all – and hopefully CNS will publish this – don’t recall that Kurt had to pay approximately CI$700,000. after being sued in connection with Hampstead?

          Why Kurt? Why did you have to be taken to court before you would pay what you owed?

          • Anonymous says:

            So what happened to McKeeva and First Cayman Bank……..

            • Anonymous says:

              CUC & PPM

              Why didn’t PPM make CUC give the Government shares for the millions of tax-payer dollars they got after Ivan.

              Its almost hurricane season – and I wonder if CUC is insured.

              Maybe PPM was misled into believing that its better to just give away the tax-payers’ money.

        • Anonymous says:

          "CUC & PPM Why would PPM make the people give CUC millions of dollars after hurricane Ivan for absolutely nothing in return?…Thats a Government you can Trust to take your hard earned money and give it to a company that has made a profit every year of its operation in Cayman".

          This has been answered many times already on this site. Don’t UDP supporters read, or are they mentally challenged? 

          Here is one final go:

          1.  CUC was entitled to permanent rate increase under its licence of 9.5%. Instead, Govt. negotiated a temporary surcharge of 4.7% resulting in a massive saving for the consumer.

          2. Even if CUC had not been entitled to a rate increase there would be nothing peculiar about allowing a surcharge to recover hurricane-related losses. Utilities in the region who were similarly affect by hurricanes were allowed to charge the surcharge, e.g. Florida Power & Light.

          3. You did get something in return. The company was allowed to recover and to provide high- quality service to consumers again. Remember when he were giving food and drinks to CUC linesmen because we were so glad to see that they had reached our road to restore power? Remember how costly it was to run our own generators and get only a few hours of power per day? How quickly we forget. 

          It serves no one’s interest to financially cripple CUC. That is short-sighted thinking.

          The PPM is indeed a Govt. you can trust!  It doesn’t try to mislead the public to get some votes.