Telephone evidence could hold up Martin verdict
However, the prosecution is arguing that the evidence is inadmissible and irrelevant, according to reports on News 27.
David Evans and Adam King, defence attorney’s for Martin, told Justice Quinn on Monday that the evidence regarding phone calls, which the crown is arguing link the defendant Martin to the 21 year old victim, has been trickling in during the trial itself. With the evidence arriving so late, the lawyers say they need time to scrutinize the phone records. Solicitor General Cheryll Richards said that the phone records had been requested in May but had been received onlyrecently. The defence also said it was having trouble getting the records it needed as well.
Category: Headline News