$2.65M taken from pensions

| 06/09/2012

piggybank-bandaid (275x300).jpgCNS): Government officials have revealed that 137 Caymanians have withdrawn a total of $2.65 million from their pensions in order to buy or build a home, purchase land or pay off mortgages under an amendment to the pensions law last year. This falls far short of the claim made backbench MLA Ellio Solomon recently that some $17 million had been injected into the economy as a result of the law, which grew from a motion filed by the former radio talk-show host in 2010. Government amended the pension law just short of a year ago to allow locals with private sector pensions to take up to $35,000 from their pension fund and invest the money in property.

Solomon now says he intends to file a similar motion calling for civil servants to withdraw cash from their Public Service Pension Fund, which may prove considerably more difficult.

The data regarding how many people in the private sector have used the facility and for what comes directly from the new Department of Labour and Pensions, which showed that 50% of the $2.65 million withdrawn by locals from private sector pensions was spent by 78 applicants on the purchase of a home, while almost one million dollars was spent on paying off 36 existing mortgages. Seventeen applicants used just under $300,000 to construct a home and a further six applicants spent $98,000 on land.

The release of the information is part of a commitment to improve the department’s systems, databases and other methodologies to ensure the timely and accurate delivery of information and technical support to its stakeholders, the department's director, Mario Ebanks, said in a release.

“Statistics such as these, dealing with withdrawals from pension plans for worthy socio-economic causes in accordance with the law, will be released regularly and at least on a quarterly basis,” Ebanks stated. “Subject to funding, the department will enhance its databases, website, and generally leverage technology in order to achieve high quantitative and qualitative outputs.”

The information comes ahead of an expected debate in the Legislative Assembly in the coming weeks on the sequel motion which Solomon plans to file that will allow civil servants to do the same thing from the public service pension. Speaking on Cayman 27 last week, the George Town MLA  admitted that there may be some resistance in the higher echelons of the civil service to the motion but he believed he had wide support for it.

However, allowing public sector workers to raid their pensions may prove much more complex, given the problems government is already facing with its liability for millions and millions of dollars towards future pensions that will need to be paid out to civil servants who have yet to retire but are entitled to do so on a fixed income.

There are concerns, too, over the damage caused to a long term investment by withdrawing a significant sum mid-way through, which has not been fully explained to those that have taken up the chance of what may feel like a cash windfall twenty years away from retirement but may place those pensioners in future poverty.

Last year a number of pension firms warned that such a $35,000 withdrawal could have a devastating impact on the final funds pensioners will be faced with when they retire and the dangers that they will then become a burden to the state. Solomon argues that those trapped in rental property when they retire will have to spend a large portion of their pension on rent but if withdrawing a sum of cash before retirement will help them to buy a home, in the long run a smaller pension may not be so much of a problem.

Under the law, those who have used their pension for a home are required to pay additional contributions of 1% and if they sell the property before they retire they will need to pay back the full amount of what is being considered a loan from the scheme.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Category: Local News

About the Author ()

Comments (88)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Chris says:

     

    I learn what is Retirement Pension Plans but i have one doubt this pension plan has two types one is conventional pension plan invest and ULIP or market linked pension plans which is best pls give detail …….. 
     
  2. Anonymous says:

    When Mr Anglin is regulating the pension law, we hope that he is taking into consideration the spouses of his Politicians too. Can you imagine if one of them died and their spouses pension was cut in half how would they survive? Or their pensions will be so big that it wont matter. Any how just play that you are in their shoes for one day and perhaps you would be able to see the real picture. If a spouse is deceased or whenever they decease the cost of living wont be any less, just think about it for a while. If you live out of town and it takes two gallons of gas to get you to the hospital if there were one of you driving in that car it would take the same amount of gas. Then if you are burning alittle AC at night time if there is only oneof you in the room it would cost the same as two. If you have loans for medical or home loans or whatever you have to pay the same amount. Pensions at one time was the full amount for the living spouse and it should be reversed. Just cut down on so much travel, unecessary body guards, the hylton hotel paving of private propertys, social service especially in the Brac handing out moneys to these foriegn children that have landed on the Cayman Brac shore, and not to mention the assistance of funds to spouses of convenient marriages. The list goes on and on. Any how Mr Anglin we understand that you are very brilliant so we hope that you will look into this matter. Even if it cant be retracted at this stage but you can consider doing so for the future  spouses.It could even be your own…

  3. Anonymous says:

    Mr. Solomon, please leave our Public Service Pension Plans alone. Reducing the pool of money we have will make it more difficult for us in the long term.

    What you should be focusing on Sir is how you can fund the past pensions liability.

     

  4. Anonymous says:

    "… a total of $2.65 million…"

     

    "This falls far short of the claim made backbench MLA Ellio Solomon recently that some $17 million had been injected…"

     

    Sounds like Mr. Solomon is grooming himself for the position of Minister for Finance.

    • Anonymous says:

      The special Ministry of ILLUSION has been created for MLA Solomon!

  5. Anonymous says:

    So what isa PENSION? The last time I checked an English dictionary it was a regular payment made by an employer to a former employee after they retire.

    So how will it be regular if it has been withdrawn early? Has Mr. Solomon ever heard of the compounding effect of money?

    Interrupting the compounding effect of a pension by early withdrawing is much more I dare say than $35000 when we are dealing with the long term. 

    So Mr. Solomon,where is the actuarial analysis, because I havent seen one yet ?

     

     

    • Anonymous says:

      Ask yourself this….What is Cayman Islands Law?

      Answer: Anything Mac and the UDP want it to be.

      And how do you they implement it you ask?

      Simple…… fire, ready, aim.

  6. Anonymous says:

    For people who support this idiocy, lets see if we can simplify the explanation as to why this 'scheme' will create more problems than help Caymanians:

    We all understand the current pensions are not sufficient to cover your living costs after retirement.  So, you will either need to contribute more to your pension scheme OR continue working past age 65 to pay your bills (mortgage, utilities, food, transport, medical etc).

    This means that withdrawing funds from your already inadequate pension scheme, to take on a 20-30 year mortgage liability does not make good financial sense.

    In a few years when the property owners reach retirement age, their pension fund will be pretty much obliterated but they will have, say 18 years left on your mortgage – how do you pay your mortgage for the property now? no savings, no pension income, no job  

    Several of these properties end up being be foreclosed on by the banks when the homeowner cant make payments; so the homeowner and dependents are unable or unwilling to work end up on welfare. Government increases fees to take care of the homeowners.

    Foolio may or may not be around to update on how his little social experiment turns out… But the one thing for certain – his parlimentary pension and fat MLA salary are safe.

     

     

     

    • Anonymous says:

      17:02 I am one of those people who support this idiocy, however before you paint us with a brush that is way too broad you might consider that some of us put more In to savings and other methods for our future than we do in to the pension plan we participate in and instead saw an opportunity to stop watching our money be lost by pension plans who do not even invest in our own country and finish paying off a mortgage so that we are now debt free andcan save even more. Personally I now have absolutely no debt as a result of this scheme, have a home and have and always will save a minimum of 30% of my monthly salary and my spouse 50% of his salary into secure investments and savings for our future, as we are in our fifties and have been doing this all of our adult lives I think you can consider me an idiot but perhaps some of us are dumb like a fox

      • Anonymous says:

        Grreat for you that you have savings and alternate investments to fall back on – but that was not a criteria for the scheme, correct? so the scheme does not care whether you have an alternate savings plan or not and might end up screwing yourself in the end?

        just lucky for you you have savings … did the other 136 applicants? no?….so I dont think the poster was wrong to point out that most or several of tyhese families will get the short end of the stick

         

         

        • Better in a house or Vegas says:

          The other 136 applicants will at least have a home when the y turn 65.  The length of a mortgage does not go beyind retirement age.

          Homes now instead of homeless later!!!

           

           

    • Anonymous says:

      Hopefully the next government corrects the MLA pension problem that gives them all an hugely enhanced pension.  Had their pensions been based on their performance, MLAs would be paying the country, not the country paying them.

    • Anonymous says:

      We’ll fix everything later on with an expat tax

    • Better in a house or Vegas says:

      First, the bank will not give you a mortgage past retirement age so the home must be paid off before you retire.  Better to live in a home now than public housing later (our taxes then paying the $$$) 

      Also until the pension schemes allow more than $1,000-$1,500 monthly payout do not fool yourself into thinking their will be a pension salary that will be your lifeblood when you retire.

      Better to get people into homes now than to be homeless and a bigger drain on the society later.

      The pension for property makes sense for any Caymanian (please extend it to expats and civil service!) who is under the age of 40.  For the next twenty years they will be paying into an investment (a home) instead of living high on souped-up fast cars and flash living beyond their means.

       

    • Anonymous says:

      Are you not familiar with banking procedures here in Cayman? Mortgages are only extended until the oldest person on the loan is 65. So how will my pension be obliterated if I take $15k out now to help buy a house that will go to my children eventually, and the mortgage is paid off by the time I am 65, and I have about $92k in my pension right now with 30 years more to work to contribute to my pension. Dont generalize in your comments. There are plenty of people that this pension swap are helping and I am one of them.

       

  7. Anonymous says:

    I can't believe all the nagativity I am reading! Elio and the UDP did something GREAT not only for the people who chose to participate and buy themselves a home which is the greatest accomplishment or largest investment a person will normally make in their lifetime, but they can pass it on to their children and future generations as well all while boosting the economy! I fail to see anything wrong with this picture! Well done Elio Solomon and the UDP!

    I do have a concern about the CS accessing their pensions, although we as a modern society should not and cannot discriminate, I would love to see the CS employees benefit from this law proposed by Elio, the problem here is that the C.I. Government, not pointing fingers at any particular party, has failed to pay it's pensions and if I'm not mistaken is approximately $400 million dollars in arrears? So how will this lack of funding, and I say failure of our Government's past and present to uphold the Pensions Law, oh wait the SuperIntendant of Pensions told me herself during my four and a half year pensions trial, "The Pensions Office has no authority over the Government's pensions" so the law doesn't apply to the Government only to us small businessman and woman. Sorry didn't mean to make this an attack on the discrimaltory pensions law, but if the fund is underfunded, how will the islands largest employer fund the many likely applications it will recieve from it's employees while protecting it's future pensioners?

    Has there been an allowance in the new budget for catching up on the Government's underfunded pensions? I last heard in the court room that the Government is paying $10 million per year into the fund. I truly hope so not only because I paid the ultimate price for my mistake in failing to properly fund my employees pensions, which I have long since corrected 100%, I would like to see how the Government could possibly pay 100% of it's pension debt immediately, plus fines as I did, and recover from the blow! I would like to know that our Government is at least paying down it's pensions debt regularly in order to protect the future of it's employees.

    Signed

    Scott Henderson

    • Truth says:

      Caymanian Government will do it the same way it does and will do everything else.  It will fail.  You know it.  I know it. And they know it.   Well maybe they don't because it seems they don't know much.  I bet they really don't realize that not paying in their share now still means they will still have to pay it later.  That just means they are not going to fail on purpose.  They just don't know any better.  Too bad they also can't listen to anyone else but Mac.  At least you were smart enough keep yourself out of trouble.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Dear MLA Ellio Solomon

    A George Town resident and Permanent Resident of the Cayman Islands sent  you two e-mails, various texts and even a few WhatsApp messages. You did not respond to even one of them, not even to say "confirm receipt of your message."

    When you present your motion to amend the Pension Swap to include civil servnats, please think about amending it as well to include Permanent Residents who have Caymanian children, as the purchase of a house by the Permanent Resident parent would greatly benefit the Caymanian children in the long run. The children's father is Caymanian and the parents are divorced. The Caymanian father owes about $12,000 in back child maintenance (he cannot keep a job and is in and out of Northward) and the Permanent Resident mother is their sole financial provider.  The Rermanent Resident mother has a good job and pays $1500 in rent a month. The Permanent Resident mother was approved by the bank for a mortgage. It is however, difficult on the mother's own to come up with the deposit and closing costs and this is where the pension withdrawal could help greatly in this situation.

    Please consider an amendment to the rules to include Permanent Residents with Caymanian children.  Thanks for your consideration.

    And to any other MLA that perhaps reads this comment, you could also bring a motion to amend the Pension Swap in the manner described above.

    • Anonymous says:

      Decisions and judgment.  A woman with a good education and a good job choosing a man who can't stay out of jail as a father for her children?  Why do decent and promising young women do that in this day and age?  Bad decision and bad judgment.  Samething happens when you withdraw anything from your pension.  You stand to lose doubly, especially if you lose the asset you invested your pension money in.

      • Anonymous says:

        Who on Earth are YOU to judge ME? And why would you imply that I would lose the asset that the pensions was withdrawn to assist in purchasing? For your information, the amount to be withdrawn would be $12,000 and I have over $70k in my pension. Also for your information, the pension is paid back by mandatory additional monthly contributions. If I have been paying rent here monthly for the last 15 years, how is it that I would be able to pay that same amount in mortgage? Why are you so quick to judge when you know nothing about my situation? And with respect to the father of my children, he was a decent man until he succombed to addiction. At that point I divorced him. Why dont you judge HIM and inquire why he will not get a job and supoprt his children; he owes over $16,000 in maintenance. And, for your information " Mr/Ms Decisions and Judgement" the bad decision and bad judgement was made by my ex-husband when he chose to get into drugs and alcohol in the last few years which is why I, using my SOUND SENSE AND GOOD JUDGEMENT, decided to divorce him so that my children would grow upin a healthy and safe environment. Instead of trolling around here on CNS, zip your damn lip and take a look at your own life before throwing stones at other people's houses.

  9. David says:

    Ellio,

    I just got my 35k and I've bought an awesome piece of land.

    God willing, I'm going to build early next year and I'll invite you over.

    Thanks again. I would rather know that my money is tied up in a piece of paradise rather than a piece of paper than can lose its value overnight.

    • Reality Bites says:

      So you have moved from a diversified investment to a single strategy in an exceptionally risky market and one which is exceptionally illiquid.  Good luck.

  10. Anonymous says:

    Pull up Rooster archive from last friday 31 August:

    Foolio was lound n proud bout $81 MILLION that has been kept in local economy. I think CNS are being conservative in reporting an inflated claim of only $17m haha

    another example of expecting a poorly educated person ("Ive done degree level studies" zzzz)  to do a job for a trained professional — it just dont make sense and the outcome is not reliable!

     

     

  11. The Highlander says:

    Is it just me or have you all noticed that all the people FOR this stupid plan seem to not just have a math problem but, they also can't spell !!!

  12. Anonymous says:

    Typical Politician – Live for the moment – no planning for the future

  13. Anonymous says:

    I think this article misses a key point which is that this $2.65m has not been used to purchase property it has been used as leverage in loans which are backed by property.

    The law does not allow us to withdraw money from our pensions to purchase a property outright – only to use as a down-payment for a mortgage (or in some cases to pay off an existing mortgage).

    Therefore the bank has 1st lein on your property and if at any time in the future the borrower fails to make payment on the loan then the bank can repossess that property. Goodbye pension and Goodbye property.

    If the people who are taking funds from their pension genuinely need to, i.e they do not earn enough to enable them to save a deposit for a home then is it not more likely that these are the same people who will get into difficulty with paying a longterm loan? Is it not more likely that these are the same people who will have their homes foreclosed and be left with nothing?

    If Ellio wants to help lower income Caymanians have a stable home that they can afford (and I believe that he does) then unfortunately this was not the way to go about it. Unfortuantely, this law has had the unintended consequence of putting our poor at even greater risk of poverty.  

     

  14. Better in a house or Vegas says:

    Come on, our pension schemes suck.  The managers are fat cats and the funds are under performing.  I think it is much better for someone to get a house now, pay off the morgage before they turn 65 and at least own a  small home when they retire than to live paycheck to paycheck with a fancy new car,flash phones, and high living now.

    As for this being a strain on the Government, what do you think will COST more?  Small retirement fund or Social Service houses for hundreds??? Huh?  Get these people into homes now or it WILL cost us plenty in the future.  

    The pension for property actually makes sense!!!  It will stimulate the economy and force young Caymanians to put their money in a home instead of high living.

    Yes, allow this for Civil Servants too please.  I'd rather see responsible mortages now than wait and hope the funds do better in the future.  Remember, these people do not stop paying into their pensions either, rather they have to add 1% more!

    Nice  houses (no-stamp duty?) going up on a GT bypass, sounds like a good investment to me.

     

  15. Anonymous says:

    Isn't the government plan something like a defined benefit plan and isn't it badly underfunded? So how can civil servants take money out? Are theirfuture  benefits going to be reduced?

    • Anonymous says:

      That pension plan is more underwater than the Titanic.  One day it will implode and it won't a 3% pay rise the civil servants will have to worry about.

  16. Anonymous says:

    A big thank you Ellio, from the bottom of my heart and many other Caymanians heart.

    And to all you 10 for putting Ellio down, you all can go fly a kite, you are insignificant to this opportunity, that we Caymanians got.

    Now we can also have our own home,… the greatest investment any Caymanian can ever make.

    In Cayman we have 4 types of charaters;

    1) The expats who are jealous of Caymanian excellingh in their own country. 2)The black crab mentality…caymanians that never want to see their own excell. 3)The financial, greedy mother f@@@ who wants this pension to continue, and not touched, so they can  get richer.4) The ordinary idiots that have no concept of their surroundings, that go around  slandering  their own people.

    Now tell me, which of you ten thumbing Ellio down, for giving his cayman people such a great oppotunity…which one of you care  about our retirement or wellfare? I live here 60 years and i don't see it, some of you pass us in the supermarket and turn away your heads,so as to not have to say hello!…., how are you today!….hypocrite, thats what you all are.

    Thank you Ellio and may God continue to bless men like you, that stand up for humanity.   

     

    • SSM345 says:

      06:40, You must be related to Foolio and have clearly emulated Mac with this diatirbe you just spouted.

      • Anonymous says:

        08:59

        Yes im related to Ellio through humanity reason,… he is my brother and  mentor. As for Mac, i will always be his supporter,… man with great vision, love  and humanity. These acolades you will never live long enough to obtain. God bless you, and have a nice day!

        • Anonymous says:

          All due respect but how can he be your mentor when you are obviously many years his senior?  What does he do to make him your mentor?

        • SSM345 says:

          Great response Foolio Jr.  What flavour kool-aid are they handing out today?

    • Anonymous says:

      Sorry but you just wrore…"In Cayman we have 4 types of character" which I take to mean that there are only 4 and you must be one of them.  Which one???

      • Anonymous says:

        Smart ass 10 ;06

        I'm neither of the 4 types of character that I mentioned. You and your  4 type of  characters are not part of the positive thinking Caymanians, otherwise you would'nt  be behaving in such a destructive manner.

        Caymanians need this opportunity to own there own  home and you are totally against it, you are in  which ever of the 4 character that fits your ideal.

    • Anonymous says:

      Ex-pats Jealous??? of what?? Corruption, lies, dodgy deals, even dodgier politicians. 

      Some people seriously overrate their own appeal!!

      Ex pats are only here for as long as it is economical for them to be so. And right now it is borderline as to whether they stay or go.. Not saying we want to go, but the facts are the facts. If expats go, then Caymanians will have to pay their own pensions and for their own civil service. How are you going to do that? It wont matter about who bought what with their pension money! I suggest there are more serious fish to fry currently than this.

      And 99% of Caymanians and expats get on fine…there is always one or two rabid dogs to try and spoil it all. Suggest you keep your offensive comments to yourself and start working towards solving the real problems here. If you cant do that then please take the long walk on the short pier and do everyone a favour.

    • NeoSurvivor says:

      Your post begs the question………  which of the four types of 'character'  you listed do you fall in to?  

       

      Do you think it's possible you might be painting with a broad brush — compartmentalising people to fit your own agenda — or are you just another "ordinary idiot that [has] no concept of [your] surrounding?"

       

      I have no problem with responsible people borrowing from their future earnings to finance a home, particularly when we are talking about the dubious earnings of our pension scheme.    We all make choices.    I fear for those who see the golden ring and try to grab it without also altering their lifestyles to be able to support a long-term mortgage.   Put another way, if a person finds themselves unable to put aside any savings toward the purchase of land and/or a house, how do they hope to be able to continue to make their payments in order to KEEP their house?  

       

      This whole "scheme" stinks, and I think you and I can agree upon that.   I take issue with your attempt to compartmentalise us all into neat little boxes of badness.  

       

       

  17. Truth. says:

    Its not a lie.  Its an "honorable" claim.  Its Caymankind.

  18. Anonymous says:

    Will this effect us when we retire ellio?

    Bracer

  19. Anonymous says:

    vote him out!

  20. Knot S Smart says:

    Did you all feel the jolt when the 17 million was injected into the economy?

    Oh. It was just 2.65 million now?

    Liar. Liar. Pants on Fire…

    • Anonymous says:

      81 million = 18 million

      17 million = 2.65 million

      Fooliomacanomics 101.

    • Anonymous says:

      I never felt the jolt, but i felt so ashamed to have you as one of us.

      let me try to put this in perspective. if 17 persons qualify to get a loan from the various banks, to  construct their homes, say at $300,000.00 each that means now $5,100,000.00 are circulating in the economy.

      Now we have 120 pesons that either bought property, paid off their loans or bought a home.

      lets now average these other 3 catagories at  spending, say $200,000.00 per person, =$24,000,000.00

      That my friend is using a conservativeexercise.

      We now have $29,100.000.00 floating around in our economy.  and more to come…thanks to Ellio. God bless Ellio!

      You and Mr. Mario are saying that it is $2.65 millions. Im not surprised, you are the perpetraitors of this scheam form the inception. Have  a good day…God bless.

      • Anonymous says:

        You obviously believe the drivel you just posted, that is frightening

  21. Just Sayin' says:

    Slow news day? This will only be news 20 years from now when those poor misled families in their rundown homes get their power and water cut off because they have failed to save for their retirement. My only hope is that Ellio is right there with them.

    • Can I vote? says:

      Would you rather have these people taking their whopping $1,000 pension and living in Government Housing that will co$st us $$$?  Yes!! The cat is out of the bag my friends!  Call your pension provider TODAY.  The TRUTH is the maximum you are allowed to withdraw from YOUR PENSION no matter how $$$ much you have saves is ONLY $1,000 per month.  This is almost criminal, but true.

      So forget politics my friends.  Do you think it is better to take $15,000 of your 30,000 pension NOW and put it into a house that will be paid off when you retire or live high on the hog for the next twenty years THINKING there will be honey pensions 20 years from now?  (and end up living on your $1000 a month in social services housing that will cost us the taxpayer at least 2,000 a month to fund you and your food stamps and utilitiy bills?  Huh???)

      Let's be rational.  Pension for propery makes sense folks.  Homes now or homeless later.

       

      • Anonymous says:

        Can I vote? I am not sure which provider gave you this information but fortunately this is not true. There are a number of ways you can currently receive pension benefits:

        1. RSA: This is a government mandated scheme which, if you take this option the government will only allow you to take CI$1,000 per month (increasing by 2% each year). This generally applies to people who do not have very much saved in their pension. I think this is the option you are referring to.

        2. Purchase an annuity – You can use the funds to purchase an annuity. The amount of money you have determines the size of the annuity you can purchase.

        3. Retirement Income fund: if you have in excess of $100k you can take 10% when you retire and then 5% of your funds each year. If your pension earns more than 5% you will be paid a bonus of the excess that it earned.

        Different providers likely have different options on how you can recieve benefits and you are free to move providers. 

      • SSM345 says:

        09:05, what happens when you take out your pension to buy a house, you then loose your job and cannot make payments?

        1) we all have to bail you out along with the other  8000 unemployed people each month

        2) you loose your house, are unemployed and you now have no pension whatsoever

        Praise Foolio, praise him.

        • Anonymous says:

          10;14

          You do not make sense. No matter how you tweak it, 137 persons are not going to be out of work on an Island that imports labour. and we are hoping to treable that with the civil servant.

           Ellio did the right thing for his poor Caymanians. enough said!

          • SSM345 says:

            11:56

            "137 persons are not going to be out of work on an Island that imports labour."

            Um, are you on crack?  Put down the pipe. There are 8000  people currently unemployed, and we still import labour.

            And secondly, my post was clear as day, you are just too thick to understand basic English.

  22. Anonymous says:

    This is a trap that people in hards times will use then when they get to retirement age they will not be able to. It means they stay in the workforce and young people dont get jobs. Wait no thats not quite whats going to happen. Then the Government will be expected to bail them out. Thanks Elio just what this country needed.

  23. Anonymous says:

    Foolio was never really all that good at mathematics… 

  24. Tuuutle says:

    Foolio ain't foolin NOOOOOOOOOOBODY!  Tuuutle

  25. Woof, woof says:

    I thought Elio was a young man of promise; but it appears he is a young man of promises.

  26. Anonymous says:

    Would it not have made far more sound financial sense if we had taken $2.65 million from the $12 million plus that we have wasted on the" Nation Building Fund"?

    Or here is an even better idea, we could have taken the $2.65 million from the $5 million "given" to the government to "save the morgages" by Dart.

    Now the really disadvantaged will end up $2.65 million + 20 years multiplier effect POORER when they stop working and really need the assistance. You know what that means, our children will be paying higher taxes so that these same people can be "helped by the Social Services Department.

    All this so that Elio Soloman can get on the radio and lie and brag that $17 million was used to buy land and houses for the disadvantaged. I hope he had the "feel good" feeling he was aiming for!!!!!!

    • Anonymous says:

      20:02 please tell me what is it, with you and the national Building fund.  Is it something personal or what>  Leave it alone will you. 

    • Peanuts says:

       

      This is proof that when a politician offers to give you something he hasto take it from some other person, in this case, Ellio gave them their own money and they think he has given them something. 

      Charity sees the need not the cause. 

      For a Government to sanction such pillaging of someones retirement fund is so short sighted. This shallow thinking is what has put the Island and it’s people in the current situation, ego driven by greed and false pride.

      I am sure that many other options exist that would have accomplished a similar goal for those seeking home ownership without sacrificing their future. 

       

       

    • Anonymous says:

      And 20;02 you sound very jealous of Ellio, the majority of the real caymanians are praising him, you 10 putting him down, are insignificant to us. We are moving forward, and getting where we want to be in life …XXXXX

      • Anonymous says:

        "majority of the real caymanians are praising him"

        uh…hell no we are not. The people praising him are the voices in his own head. Hope you all have enough money saved up for retirement now that you have blown your entire pension and now have a huge mortgageto pay off.

        I suppose you wiill  expect us all to bail you out after you have retired and you have no money to pay your bills?

        These are the same people that get fridges and tv's.

        Wake Up,

        A Caymanian who doesn't praise corruption and doesn't have his head burried in the sand.

        • Truth Hurts says:

          Have your voices call my voices…we'll do lunch….

        • Anonymous says:

          09;07

          You sound like you are  really pissed off.You are not the majority that  is plain to see.

          Why dont you just admit you  do not like the present Governmnet, because you can't manipulate them.

          For your information im a cayman business man. i just dont agree with the way the retirement funds are set up.

          Will you defend these same  retirement, with  the same zeal, if government was to take this over and run it like a proper social security? i dont think so, because there wont be anything in it for you, and the likes of you. 

          • Anonymous says:

            In response to both of you, I am far from rich so do not make any assumptions on that. I have busted my ass, had ups and major downs, turned my life around and have done something instead of complaining and expecting handouts.

            Secondly, my main crux on this whole matter is the fire, ready and aim approach that has been implemented with this "scheme" and all other government business and affairs in the current and past administrations with absolutely no consultation from those who should be consulted i.e. professionals  who deal with these sorts of things as their profession. And furthermore if there has been consultation, it has been completely ignored because the powers that be have this idea that they are somehow now expersts on everything.

            You can all carry on praising these guys now with your short-short-short sight, but I can tell you, unless this government is sorted out along with all the other messes, you are all going to get a big suprise, that we have all been alluding too all along.

            And yes, i cannot  stand the current bunch of morons who run this country, but i have hope for May when some fresh blood will be in the political arena.

            Nuff said.

             

        • Anonymous says:

          to 9;07

           

          I have lived in these Island for 60 years and have never seen any of you rich people on here,  helping  any Caymanian poor people.

          Now why all of a sudden, you now show so much  fussand care  about making sure we have retirement funds.

          What are your vested interest in this so called pension scheme…controlled and opperated by your all, financial instituations?

          I beg to ask the question again, will you all have the same zeal towards a social security , should the Cayman Island Government institute one? PLEASE ANSWER ME THAT QUESTION!

    • Anonymous says:

      20:02

       

      Long live the NBF and may it continue to bite you all in the ass.

      • Anonymous says:

        Long live the NBF? Which recipient are you? The one that received the "settlement" of $30,000 and lives in South Sound and has his house for sale for CI$1,150,000?

        • Anonymous says:

          or the $35,000 per year NBF salary paid to 10+ UDP loyalists as "Barkers Park Ranger"

          or the $5,000 a month NBF salary to a UDP loyalist to 'manage' 1 amateur singing career

          or the $100,000 a year salary to a UDP minion to box, maybe hold a fight but not don't have to

          or the free NBF $$$ to send 1 UDP loyalist to a audition for a tv show

           

  27. Anonymous says:

    Mr. Bellingham must have loved his tenure when dealing with this crowd. .

  28. Snakes & Ladders says:

    So Elio, how do these Caymanians now support themselves in retirement? The answer is they won't be able to and it will be up to government to pick up the slack. So in summary Caymanians are withdrawing their pensions to improve there financial situaton now, only for every duty and fee payer (taxpayers really) to pay for it down the track…lets kick that can down the street.

    • Anonymous says:

      I believe it is their money.  So it was their choice to spend it now or live to old age and cannot spend it then to be happy but buy pampers and seabond.  Come off it because cayman is tired of hearing you all moaning about the Nation Building Fund.

    • Anonymous says:

      19:24

      Seem like you lack understanding, or you just opposing Ellio for helping his own people.

      Most of these reciepiants that were able to qualify, for the use of  a portion of their pensions, are still at a robust age, and  working… contributing to their pension. so what is the real problem? 

       

       

       

      • Anonymous says:

        07:29, What happens if they loose their job tomorrow and cannot get employment? That scenario flew right over your head didin't it?

        Ever hear of forward thinking or are you one of those people that just lives in the "now"?

  29. Anonymous says:

    So… all of 75 people withdrew?

  30. Anonymous says:

    WHAT…??? UDPILLIO gave misleading information…???… SAY IT AIN'T SO.

  31. Anonymous says:

    UDP math fuzzy? Say it ain't so… HAHAHA

    • Stiffed-Necked Fool says:

      No wonder they cant balance the budget!

    • Anonymous says:

      Thanks, CNS, for calling out the GT MLA on this. Veracity does not seem to be a strong for some people. Keep your eyes and ears on the alert CNS. In addition, there are bound to be repercussions tomorrow to raiding pension funds today. It may look like a quick win, but think about the long-term, folks. Remember that some politicians have one goal — votes, especially given that elections are drawing near. Look at what happened to the world when the US financiers became greedy and did not think about the long-term impact of the decisions they were making. Whenever decisions are motivated by self-interests they very often bode no good for all.

    • Anonymous says:

      He's very obviously being trained by the best in the business.

  32. SKEPTICAL says:

    Well YELLIO, doesn’t look as though Maths is your strong subject – $17million down to $2.65million ?