Lord Blencathra threatens legal action

| 30/11/2012

Lord Blencathra.jpg(CNS): Following the publication by the UK’s House of Lords Sub-Committee on Conduct of the official report dismissing complaints against the director of the Cayman Islands London Office, Lord Blencathra, the Tory peer who is paid to promote the interests of Cayman in the UK and Europe, issued a statement to Cayman News Service saying that he was seeking legal advice on whether to take action against those in the UK who initiated the “libel” that provoked the complaint and any news outlets overseas who repeated it. Meanwhile, there has been no statement from the London Office concerning the revelations that the UK is planning to impose drastic tax information sharing rules on its dependencies, including Cayman.

In his report, the Commissioner for Standards Paul Kernaghan cleared Blencathra of breaching the House of Lords Code of Conduct. Citing a report of the Sub-Committee on Lords' Interests (as it then was), he stated: “The distinction between advocacy and advice is crucial. Inevitably, however, there are borderline issues. These may place too great a burden on the judgment of the individual Member and may lead him to cross the boundary between what is legitimate and what is not.

"Members willing to take money in return for parliamentary services place themselves in great danger of crossing the boundary, knowingly or inadvertently. Even when a Member's intention is limited to obtaining information, the very fact of approaching, on behalf of paying clients, MPs, other Lords, Ministers and civil servants, may give rise to a perception of advocacy and lobbying. The impression can easily be given that not only advice but also advocacy has been bought by the client. Whether or not a Member has indeed crossed the boundary from the permissible depends on the facts of each case."

The complainant in the case was made by Labour MP Paul Flynn, who wrote to the commissioner requesting that he investigate Lord Blencathra on the basis of an article in The Independent on 17 April 2012.

The complainant alleged that Lord Blencathra provided parliamentary services to the government of the Cayman Islands Office in the United Kingdom. The complainant specified five instances where it is alleged that occurred, and provided a transcript of a press conference given by Lord Blencathra on Cayman27 in which he spoke about his role.

The Commissioner found Lord Blencathra not to have breached the Code of Conduct, finding that the instances complained of did not amount to the provision of parliamentary advice or services.

In his statement addressed specifically to CNS, Lord Blencathra said, “This was always a bogus complaint fabricated by the discredited Bureau of Investigative Journalism. That is an organization funded by Labour Party supporters. Its ethos is anti-Conservative, anti-Lords, anti-IFCs and anti-Thatcher. The journalist and the Independent explicitly made those links in the article in order to discredit me as well as making the highly libelous allegation that my expenses were subject to special scrutiny which is a lie.”

“Now that the Commissioner has exonerated me I have consulted the lawyers acting for Lord McAlpine [a Tory peer who was wrongfully identified in a BBC documentary as a paedophile] who is also taking action against the Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Depending on the legal advice, it is my intention to take action against those in the UK who initiated the libel and any news outlets overseas who repeated that libel.”

Neither the Bureau of Investigative Journalism nor The Independent have received any correspondence from Lord Blencathra on his intentions regarding possible legal action.

Lord Blencathra was appointed director of the London Officer a year ago and it has since been revealed through an FOI request that he and his consultancy company, Two Lions, are costing the public purse more than CI$19,500 per month. Redacted correspondence between Blencathra and Cayman civil servants implies that his appointment was timed to ensure that he could attend the London meeting the premier had with the OT minister at the time, Henry Bellingham, in November 2011, during which McKeeva Bush signed the Framework for Fiscal Responsibility agreement, which the premier now says he did under duress.

The details of Blencathra’s contract, revealed through the freedom of information request, shows that government felt in the “changing global financial circumstances” that the London office needed to expand its traditional goals to include strengthening the relationship between the Cayman government and the FCO, as well as other UK and European organisations, and actively promote Cayman in the business communities there. The contract also points to the need for someone to help identify opportunities for development and inward investment to diversify the Cayman economy and expand the islands’ revenue base.

The contract states that Lord Blencathra and his firm, Two Lions Consultancy, had been identified as having the experience and skills to undertake the proposed expansion of the London Office, working alongside the deputy director, Charles Parchment, who would continue to take on the more traditional duties of the London office. According to the Department of Commerce and Investment, the London Office, not counting the Department of Tourism side, has three staff members, and its budget for 2011/12 totalled CI$817, 763. 

According to a release issued at the time of his appointment, Lord Blencathra’s immediate agenda included developing a more comprehensive understanding with the FCO and other governmental organizations in the UK of the financial management of the Cayman Islands, its economy and its day to day operations.

Tasked with promoting the Cayman Islands' interests in the UK and Europe, officials said after his appointment that he would be liaising with and promoting the interests of the Cayman Islands at last year’s Overseas Territories Consultative Council. In particular, the peer would be assisting the CIG in developing the new accord for the Overseas Territories with the UK government.

Now that it has been revealed that the UK may impose “Son of FATCA” rules on its OTs and Crown Dependencies, CNS has asked Lord Blencathra via email what action has been, or is being, taken by him, the London Office or Two Lions in response to this news, and also what effect this will have on the offshore financial services industry and, in particular, the Cayman Islands.

We also asked: “Given this latest development, can you say if the Cayman Islands London Office has been in any way effective in changing the narrative in Europe or the UK concerning the negativity towards the Cayman Islands since you were appointed as director? If so, can you specify what you have achieved?”

But although we received earlier that day the statement concerning his personal issues, there has so far been no response to our enquiries concerning these latest moves by the UK.

See Standards Commissioner's full report

Related articles:

‘Son of FATCA’ talks in UK (CNS Business 30 November 2012)

UK commissioner clears Lord (CNS 7 October 2012)

UK Lord costs £14k+ pcm (22 June 2012) 

Lord gets top UK Cayman job (CNS 14 November 2011) 

David Maclean: expense claims of MP who led fight to keep payouts secret (The Telegraph 17 May 2009)

Category: Local News

About the Author ()

Comments (21)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    Notice he's wearing pants with the colder weather at this time of year, God bless him. Can't say I blame him.

  2. Anonymous says:

    What damages do you expect for harm to your reputation when this is the main thing you are known for:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5336230/MPs-expenses-cash-secrets-of-MPs-who-tried-to-stop-you-seeing-their-expenses.html

  3. Turtle's Head says:

    At best a waste of money. 

  4. Anonymous says:

    The London office and the political cronies who work there is another expense we can no longer afford. Is it still in a really expensive area to rent?

    • Anonymous says:

      Yes, 17:44, it is still in a LUDICROUSLY expensive part of London (unlike any other Overseas Territory Office) and it still does nothing/zero nada to advance the case of the Cayman Islands in UK/Europe.

  5. Dreadlock Holmes says:

    It's probably a good idea the U.K. will be overseeing to some extent expenditure and fiscal management of the CIG. Because some adult supervision is obviously needed.

    But do we have to go along with the Lord thing too?  Or pay attention to it? This article is ridiculous. The whole concept of Lords, Dukes, Dutchesses, etc. is so outdated it's laughable. Take away their silly clothes, wigs and walking sticks, and they are ordinary people trying to carry on a tradition of entitlement which in their minds puts them in a higher class of civilization. Of course, it's not true. Civilization has progressed. People are now judged and admired by what they actually accomplish. Or we hope so, not because of some arbritrary title bestowed on them or inherited from the past. This tradition seems to be stuck in a time warp. Lord Whats His Name, no matter what he'd like to believe…. is a lobbyist. He put himself up for hire like a bricklayer or bus driver. Like all hirelings he gets paid. And… we pay him. Calling himself a Lord, posturing and insisting everyone else call him by some ancient title doesn't change that. In fact it's offensive. We pay you to do a job. Get off your high horse and do it.

    • Anonymous says:

      Actually, he's a life peer,  his reward for long service to the Labour party as an elected Member of Parliament. Hereditary peers no longer have an automatic right to sit in the House of Lords – they elect a smaller group who represent them. Reforming a nearly thousand-year-old institution (in 2015) takes a little while and it's worth taking the time to get it right

      As for the wigs and robes – they don't wear them every day, you know – just for the formal ceremonies – the tourists love it.

  6. Anonymous says:

    More lack of class shining through.  Mac picked a representative in his own image.  Cayman's reputation is more important than the repuation of a puff up failed politician.  The chance of a politician winning a libel suit post-Reynolds?  Snowball in hell.  Put your threats away sir and show us you are worth the money we pay you and your son and your wife.

    • Anonymous says:

      People why are you so conflicted so negative. You want to know who want get rid of you get close to him by whatever means.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Salutations to all the British twits out there milking the colonies of their last few dollars.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Never mind suing newspapers, he should sue his tailor.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Talking of legal action; I wonder if Rupert the Bear could sue to get his trousers back.

  10. Round four says:

    "And they keep on to me about a lack of accounting and my deals! And my travel expenses!  And your wages andwhat you do I threatened to sue them. But no one takes me seriously because of the investigations."

    "Don't worry about it, I'll threaten to sue them…. I'm a Lord!"

    "Oh, and your check bounced."

  11. Anonymous says:

    Lord Blencathra is a good man. All of the bad things that people blame on him were actually done by someone else name David Maclean. Probably an East Ender who also takes conchs out of season and lobsters from the marine park.

  12. Stylin' says:

    "If I saw my self in pants like that I'd kick my own a$$!" – Happy Gilmore

  13. Knot S Smart says:

    Dear Lord.

    We pray that the first thing that our new Govt does after the election is to relieveyou from your post as our representative…

    You are a nice Lord and everything – but wees broke…

  14. Anonymous says:

    Sounds like, "I'll huff, and I'll puff, and I'll blow your house down," to me and we know how that ended up.

    The courts in the UK are unlikely to be anywhere as near as sympathetic to this as the Commissioner for Standards appears to have been and all his past conduct (the expenses issues when he was David Maclean MP) will be dragged out and painfully re-visited.

    Just make sure he isn't putting his legal expenses on the Cayman Islands' tab.

    • Anonymous says:

      All this right-wing posturing is going to do the Cayman Islands no good at all so maybe CIG should now be asking whether he's the right man for the job.

      If I understand correctly the current Governor, Duncan Taylor, opposed this appointment and everything that's happened since shows his judgment was, for once, 100% correct.

  15. Anonymous says:

    The London Office is a waste of money and kudos to CNS for asking Lord Blencathra that second question about whether the Office has changed the narrative about Cayman. It never has and never will so it might as well be closed. But what would poor Charles Parchment do?